EVE Search - EVE Online: Empyrean Age 1.1 Patch Deployment Discussion Thread

All Channels

EVE Information Portal

EVE Online: Empyrean Age 1.1 Patch Deployment Discussion Thread

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 33 post(s)

CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:03:00 - [1] Originally by: Daelin Blackleaf "Creating a shortcut using "Shift" + "F1-F12" will require the use of "Alt" or "Ctrl". Therefore a shortcut would need to be "Ctrl-Shift-F1" or "Alt-Shift-F1"" Why? This entry in the patch notes is incorrect. It will be corrected. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.29 19:06:00 - [2] Originally by: chelsy Elstar "Direct X 9.0c will install normally without Administrator privileges if Direct X needs to be installed." Excuse me? Computer programs should NEVER ôcircumventö admin privileges. Admin privileges are there for a reason you know. This entry needs to be reworded, we are moving the invocation of the DirectX install from the EVE client to the EVE installer/patcher. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.30 15:46:00 - [3] Originally by: Cassian Miroslav CONCORD and Response Times ... CONCORD response times for aggressing a neutral player in High Security space have also been significantly reduced. CONCORD and Criminal Standings Multiple changes have been made in standing hits for players who aggress a neutral player in High Security space. In addition to a significantly increased CONCORD response time, ... I am confused. Is CONCORD response time increased or reduced? Reduced. The latter statement above will be corrected. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.30 15:47:00 - [4] Edited by: CCP Explorer on 30/08/2008 15:47:22 Originally by: Marlenus Quote: Militia office icon is only displayed if user is signed up for Factional Warfare. Er, isn't that the button people use to sign up for Factional Warfare? Or, am I confused? This entry in the release notes is a misunderstanding of certain changes that were made in this release and will be corrected. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.30 15:53:00 - [5] Originally by: Letouk Mernel Originally by: Honeyz Quote: Jump cloning to a clone in the same station as you are in will now work as intended. Can someone please explain to me what this means Currently, if you fly to the station where your JC is and jump, the JC will be lost along with implants etc. I'm guessing they're fixing this. Confirmed, this is what is being fixed. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.30 15:55:00 - [6] Originally by: nutbar Originally by: Patch Notes Grammatical errors have been corrected in corrected in "Cant Target While Cloaked" and "Cant Target While Jumping" messages. Ahh, the irony :D Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.30 17:57:00 - [7] Originally by: Cheeva am i correct in seeing the no insurance when you get killed by concord is not implemented? You are correct, there are no functional changes to the insurance system in this release. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.31 12:18:00 - [8] Originally by: Nyphur I see that standing hits for killing npc corp members have been removed. This entry has been corrected, the standings hit is only removed if the killing occurs in 0.0. Quote: Also this: "Militia office icon is only displayed if user is signed up for Factional Warfare." This entry remains to be corrected, there are changes but not this change. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.31 12:29:00 - [9] Edited by: CCP Explorer on 31/08/2008 12:30:37 Originally by: Virgo I'Platonicus Quote: An example of this would be a player in a 0.8 system with a -3.0 standing, in which the true standing is -3.000499999 will be rounded up to -3.05 meaning they move from safe to outlaw status and would be destroyed by Faction Police upon undocking from a station. This is probably a typo? You mean rounded up to -3.01?V. There was a typo there, but not this typo The current, correct entry is Quote: An example of this would be a player in a 0.8 system with a -3.0 standing, in which the true standing is -3.0499999 will be rounded up to -3.05 meaning they move from safe to outlaw status and would be destroyed by Faction Police upon undocking from a station. In other words, if your security status is -3.0499999 then it's currently being rounded to -3.0 for comparison to the threshold, which for a 0.8 system is -3.0. After the deployment of Empyrean Age 1.1 it will rounded to two decimal digits, the result will be -3.05 and you will be shot Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.31 13:02:00 - [10] Edited by: CCP Explorer on 31/08/2008 13:05:42 Originally by: Daelin Blackleaf Taken together the stuff in green has a lot more impact (for me at least) than the stuff in white. This is great work on the part of the guys editing the notes but terrible work from the people who released them to start with. If I may respectfully disagree, then I think that those that wrote the release notes did excellent work. But when reviewing more than 1.000 tasks, defects and other changes, categorising them and translating them from tech speak into entries suitable for the release notes, then there is always room for some errors. Our excuse is that the EVE Software Group was at seminar this week on the Python programming language so unfortunately we didn't have an opportunity to review the notes before the they were released. But that's the reason I'm working this weekend with CCP Navigator correcting and adding to the notes (you may notice that the changes are all code related, other groups had already reviewed and corrected other parts). My apologies but please rest assured that the release notes will definitely be in tip-top shape before the deployment. I hope that you will enjoy EVE Online: Empyrean Age 1.1 because we are proud to be delivering this update to you. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.31 14:28:00 - [11] Edited by: CCP Explorer on 31/08/2008 14:29:08 Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel Won't decreasing the number of Concord ships make it easier on the suicide gankers? 3 concord, 10 gankers. means only 3 can die at the same time, forcing the killing of suiciders to be done in series rather than in parallell like (I suppose) was the case before. If that's the case that leaves the non primaried gankers more time to do their job. A group of CONCORD ships is still spawned for each aggressor. So in the example above a total of 30 ships would arrive, a group of 3 ships attacking each ganker. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.31 14:56:00 - [12] Originally by: Avarr Mentias some issues as soon as you join a fleet and you going to jump gate you have wait 25 seconds The session change timer is 30 seconds and is intended. Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.08.31 17:54:00 - [13] Edited by: CCP Explorer on 31/08/2008 18:05:13 Originally by: Reptzo It is also worthwhile noting that once you have been naughty enough to warrant a security status of below or equal to -5.0, you will be considered an outlaw and whenever you attack someone in a low security system you will become criminally flagged, as long as your target has a security status above -5.0. What exactly changed here? Aren't you flashy red once you hit -5 anyways? What difference does this make? Nothing changed here. This point is simply being emphasized in the context of the CONCORD changes being made. It's also being mentioned because the overview pilot state filter currently called "Pilot has a security status below -5" is being renamed to "Pilot is an outlaw". The corresponding tool tip text is being changed from "True if pilot has worse than -5.0 security status and can be attacked everywhere" to "True if pilot has worse than -5.0 security status or has aggressed against you and can be attacked everywhere". But there are no functional changes, the text in the UI is simply being clarified. (Please note that the above UI change is mentioned in the release notes as "Thieves appear as flashing red on the Overview even when "Show pilots with sec status -5" is turned off" but is currently being revised since it's inaccurate.) Erlendur S. Thorsteinsson Software Director EVE Online, CCP Games


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.09.01 17:14:00 - [14] Originally by: Gartanus I am really liking the new fixes. Hope all goes well with the deployment. Just in case tho, I have set a 21 day skill Why? What could possibly go wrong?


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.09.01 19:46:00 - [15] Originally by: Treelox Originally by: CCP Explorer Originally by: Gartanus I am really liking the new fixes. Hope all goes well with the deployment. Just in case tho, I have set a 21 day skill Why? What could possibly go wrong? boot.ini...........anyone?????? No... I don't seem to have any, but I have a start.ini


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.09.01 19:53:00 - [16] Originally by: Leneerra Impressive list of fixes but there is one thing in there I am not happy with: Corporations who are not involved with Factional Warfare will no longer show up as having active wars against any Militia. So now player corps can dodge a wardec by going militia? No. The issue was that if players involved in factional warfare looked up other corporations' wars from the "other wars" tab in the corporation window, then those other corporations would show up as being involved in factional warfare, even if they were not. This was a display issue only.


CCP Explorer	Posted - 2008.09.01 22:05:00 - [17] Originally by: Borun Tal This may have been asked already, and I apologize in advance if I missed it in this thread, but are players required to d/l a new compilation of the client and install, or is this all server-side? When you start your client after the DT tomorrow (server-up is scheduled at 17:00 GMT) then the client will prompt you, download an update and apply it to your installation.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.